SUMMATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK

What can aquatic organisms tell us about the health of a body of water?

OUTLINE

*For more detailed instructions, see the full lesson plan. 

Before completing this activity, your students should have tested a local body of water by macroinvertebrate sampling. They will write lab reports about the procedure they followed and the data they collected. 

Note: If your students are completing this lesson alongside a geoscience or geography lesson, they may turn in a data-based map of the testing site along with their lab report.

Have your students write their lab reports based on these detailed instructions.

In general, the students’ lab reports should meet the following objectives: 

  • Describe what you did, following the structure of the scientific method
  • Share the data you collected using charts, graphs, and/or maps
  • Share and explain the calculations you made based on your data
  • Draw conclusions based on your data and calculations 
  • Reflect on your overall experience and make plans for what you will do differently the next time you visit the testing site

Have your students read each other’s lab reports. If you had your students do their testing in small groups, make sure that every student reads at least one report associated with each group. As they read, the students should write about the following prompts: 

  • Did your classmates encounter problems similar to the ones you faced?
  • Compare the data you collected to the data your classmates collected.
  • Do you see any major patterns or contradictions? Do the different sets of data tell the same story?
  • Does the water quality fluctuate a lot throughout the body of water? In other words, does the problem appear to be more concentrated in some areas than others, or is it pretty evenly spread out? 
  • How well does our scientific data match up with our photos/observations? How might the surrounding structures and features in the area be contributing to the problems we found? 
  • The next time we visit our testing site, what could we do to make our data more reliable and useful? 
  • What mistakes did we make, and how could we correct them? 
  • What elements could we add to our study to make our data more meaningful? 
  • Which sample spots should we revisit? Should we take samples from any new spots?

Bring the class together for a discussion about the writing prompts above. Take notes as the students talk. At the end of the conversation, make a plan for how you will do things differently during the next round of water quality testing. In addition, start talking about how you might want to share your data. 

ASSESSMENT

Grade the students’ lab reports based on the following criteria: 

  • Did the student come up with a relevant “compelling question” for their experiment? (e.g. What is the water quality like at our local body of water?)
  • Did the student provide a detailed and comprehensive procedure, including information about the materials they used? 
  • Did the student explain how and why they deviated from their original procedure? 
  • Did the student describe the data they collected? 
  • Did the student attach their filled-out documentation form to their lab report? 
  • Did the student attach their calculations to their lab report (showing full work)? 
  • Did the student explain how they did their calculations? 
  • Did the student share and explain the results of their calculations? 
  • Did the student draw reasonable conclusions based on their data? 
  • Did the student back up their conclusions with data-based evidence?
  • Did the student identify multiple mistakes that might have been made during testing? 
  • Did the student describe multiple challenges they faced while testing? 
  • Did the student list multiple things they would like to do differently the next time they do macroinvertebrate sampling, and why?